some quotes....

I just want to tell you, I'm the one who was supposed to take care of everything. I'm the one who was supposed to make everything okay for everybody. It just didn't work out like that. And I left. I left you... And now, I'm an old broken down piece of meat... and I'm alone. And I deserve to be all alone. I just don't want you to hate me.

-Randy 'The Ram' Robinson, The Wrestler

samedi 30 mars 2024

La Passion de Dodin Bouffant (2023)

 


I know that this film has been considered "overrated" by many, especially since it was inexplicably selected to represent France at the 96th Oscars instead of "Anatomie d'une chute", which is among if not the best wide-released cinematic works of the Western world in 2023. To me "Anatomie d'une chute" is indeed better-rounded and more memorable, but "La passion de Dodin Bouffant" has its own merit. Of course, just like numerous other films by Trần Anh Hùng, the performance in this film is not really the focal point, neither its strong aspect (despite the absence of Trần Nữ Yên Khê - Trần Anh Hùng's eternal muse [he did dedicate this film to his wife] but, again, in my opinion only, not really an outstanding actress), but the humanist interactions between the characters are extremely effective and moved me a lot, a lot. I love the fact that this film does not only appear peaceful and cozy, but is indeed a peaceful and cozy film, where everyone is kind and good to each other without any hint of bitterness, jealousy, or pessimism. Watching this film thus really warmed my heart seeing how people of different tastes, different social standings, different ages, and even different world view could be so caring, so subtle, so dedicated to the ones they love and the one they care about - the same way a visionary "gourmand" like Dodin and an outstanding chef/cuisinière like Eugénie take care of their food. Naturally this is a film about food, and about how passion and dedication transform a simple dish into a unforgettable dish, and a good dish into a "tear-jerking" dish. But this is also a film about camaraderie, about soulmates, about the many aspects of interactions and harmony between two hearts that share the same beating frequency in Dodin and Eugénie that are way more than thus "love" and professional harmony. I especially love the very final scene of this film, where Dodin affirmed to Eugénie that she's not his "femme" (his wife, or simply his "woman") but rather his "cuisinière" - a role encompassing BOTH aspects of Dodin's life - his private one, and his "professional" one, and also a role of more equal footing with Dodin in all aspects. Talking about language, I really, really like the French Trần Anh Hùng used for this film's script, as it makes the film so much better, so much more moving, so much more emotional and thus memorable from beginning to end (an important point since the film's pacing is rather slow while the length is not really encouraging for those who prefer shorter and more entertaining films). On this note, I find it pretty funny that Dodin and Eugénie agreed that Dodin is anyone but a poet, but by the end, Dodin's thought and lines just become more and more poetic and romantic like a true poet. Just like the other works of Trần Anh Hùng, this film also has magnificent lighting and scene composition (both indoor and outdoor) to the point that you can cut any single random frame in this film and it would instantly look like a painting with no need for forcing the director's view on to the audience. Sure, this film might be a little bit slow, a little bit long, a little bit dry to some, but once you pay it some attention, you will quickly become emotional observing such a beautiful relationship between Dodin and Eugénie. Such a wonderful film, I would easily give this one a 4.5.

vendredi 1 mars 2024

Anatomie d'une chute (2023)

 


This film is so good on so many levels that not only I enjoyed watching it very much but it also made me think about things - a hard task these days given the fact that I already have a full hand of things that I have to think about everyday.

Firstly, as a legal drama, or more correctly, a courtroom drama, this film is just a perfect one from start to finish with a very subdued (and thus realistic) tempo except for a few moments of emotional peaks during the examination sessions very typical of a realistic court case (the larger part of this film is dedicated to the actual procedures in front of the judge and jury, and only a small part on the preparation and aftermath, so it is rather a courtroom drama - like 12 Angry Men instead of a legal one - like Primal Fear, in my opinion). This "faithfulness" of this film vis-à-vis a French court process is actually very important and meaningful to me, since I have been a big fan of the "true crime" genre in recent years and just fascinated by and paid great attention to good true crime films. But as its name implies, most good true crime films just focus on "the crime" and not on the court process, which might be to the filmmakers already a "done deal" despite the fact that in reality court process, the prosecutors' and defense lawyers' talent (or lack thereof), and defendant's and witnesses' "performance" ARE the decisive factor that leads to a conviction (or not), and NOT the facts/evidences gathered/left behind by the investigators/culprits. And this film is a very, very rare example of a magnificent courtroom drama (I discount My Cousin Vinny, which is too humorous for its own good and too exaggerated for a realistic courtroom drama) even until its very end, when the audience, just like the (almost) blind young witness, have to follow the court events one at a time, unsure what is the truth, what is the fiction, who is right, who is wrong, even after the final verdict was already given by the court. This ambiguity of the script is extremely tasteful, as it gives the film a necessary dose of tension to compensate for its lack of action sequences or crime depictions, the audience a doubtful impression about the characters, about the court process, about the whole thing, and surprisingly enough some comfort, doubtful it is though, thanks to the very final scene with the lovely dog Snoop (acted amazingly by "Messi" - he should have given an acting nomination for this film, how could he, a dog, "act" perfectly like that I have no idea).

Secondly, this film has a masterful treatment of the relationship between languages and emotions and loneliness. Thanks to a wonderful performance by Sandra Hüller (I pray to God that she would win the golden statue this year at the Oscar, but she simply has no chance given the political correctness attitude of Hollywood these days, which will 110% give the award to Lily Gladstone due to her native American origin), the audience, especially ones with a sufficient understanding of English, French, and German like me, really feel the emotional "switch" when her character Sandra Voyter had to change from French to English to express herself fully in front of the judge and jury, or when she uttered some rare German words ("Ja"/Yes) when being pushed to the extreme emotionally. Voyter's utter loneliness is also palpable to the audience when they observe the French around her can do some "chit chat" in simple French with her but would switch to fully "high-brown" sophisticated French at court, which not only confused Voyter but also forced her (again) to the realization that she is no one but a stranger in this snowy French town. I feel Voyter's desolation a lot, since I can also speak French comfortably enough but have never been able to become "good enough" to not stand among French people as a stranger from a strange land due to the language barrier. The switching back and forth between French and English in this film naturally reminds me of Inglourious Basterds - a marvellous film in my opinion successful in making the different languages, and language differences become another "character" of the film.

Thirdly, this film is a very thought-provoking piece of philosophical cinema on the subject of prejudice, misogyny and the definition of success, roles, and responsibilities in a modern society. In the era of "Me Too" and LGBT-and-many-more, one might think that prejudice and misogyny is just a "simple" theme that can be tackled with various approaches. But to make such an approach engaging, relatable, and not "preachy" is not at all an easy task. Rather, people have to dig deeper into the subconsciousness to find the commonality in terms of "inherent" misogyny and prejudice between people of different backgrounds, different culture, different countries. And this film just did it perfectly. Not only it shows an obvious misogynistic hostility of the prosecutorial side against women like Voyter, but also gives the audience seveval "awakening" moments about their own prejudices, like when Voyter had to beg the prosecutor and others to remember that her blind son IS enjoying his BEST life instead of SUFFERING from his visual impairment - something he could not change and does not have to change to make his life "better" (in the eyes of other "normal people" with full visual capability). There are many small but meaningful moments and dialogues like that sprinkled throughout the film that make this film an even better watching experience than it already is.

This film is so emotional, so impactful, and so well-made that I really, really hope that it can win the Oscar for Best Picture this year, but obviously Hollywood already made its choice with the bombastic and showy Oppenheimer. I can only wish that Justine Triet will be able to at least win a "consolation" statue in either the Best Director or Best Original Screenplay categories.

dimanche 29 octobre 2023

Matthew Perry, aka. Chandler Bing (1969 - 2023)

 

This quote above from “The One with Rachel’s Other Sister” (S09E08) is not only a very typical dialogue from the ever self-deprecating Chandler Bing, but turns out to be a prophecy as well. To me, Chandler is always the best character with the most memorable moments in any of the ten seasons of “Friends” and IS the true definition of a good and kind-hearted friend that anyone, including me, could hope for.

So long Mr. Bing, thank you for all the laughs and optimism that you brought me at my very lowest. I hope you will enjoy your afterlife as much as I will always enjoy your banters with your friends in “Friends”.

mardi 6 juin 2023

One sentence reviews (16)

 


Phần 15

01. John Wick: Chapter 4 (2023): 2/5

Normally I would use the poster of the first film on this thread as the thread's cover picture, but since this film is thoroughly mediocre, I will save that place for another film. I do not understand the raving scores film critics have given this film, nor the incredible hype Redditors have dedicated for this one since before its opening. Were it a simple "video-game" film, I would have given it a good score too, considering the hilariously "beat-being beaten-revive to beat" repeat mode of this film that of course reminds people of "Max Payne" or the top-down perspective of one shooting sequence in Paris that clearly reflects the influence of the top-down shooter genre, especially "Hotline Miami". However, since this film is considered a "neo-noir" action film of the first rate, I would review it as such. This film is all style-over-substance, and in the worst way possible, as the "style" was established with a slick appearance yet giving out a deep sense of shallowness of B- or direct-to-DVD movies, yes, that bad in my opinion. In addition, the style-over-substance nature of this film is also reflected through its way-too-long running time that can easily make the audience tired since the lack of any decent pacing make this film just a very long action sequence without any actual rhythm or necessary "resting time" for the audience to savour the immediate previous action sequence. Thus by the end all the action sequences stay pretty much the same to viewers (except maybe the "Hotline Miami" sequence"), as they were indeed choreographed and filmed in very similar manners. The very, very pretentious dialogues of this film, with foreign words and short sentences injected here and there for absolutely no reason except for maybe making this film sound cheap, especially to the audience of said languages, only makes the matter worse - for example ALL the French dialogues in this film (except for the radio announcer) were spoken by those who DO NOT handle well this language at all, that is just maddening to me! The tiring feeling of this film also comes from the fact that it has NO STAKE at all, since no matter how many adversaries are onscreen or how strong one "appears" to be, John Wick will simply prevail by ... covering his face with his bullet-proof vest (who approved this ugly and super passive style of action for this film????), unlimited magazines, and unbreakable bones despite ALL falling heights. Why modern Hollywood blockbusters are so afraid of stakes I have no idea, as the fact that NO ONE of any significance die in this film (disregarding the very poorly-constructed main villain) really makes it a very unimpactful one in terms of emotion building for the audience. Wick's obvious invincibility might be a selling point in a superhero or over-the-top action film, but this one is all about redemption, about the fallibility of power (I think - especially given the weakling appearance of John Wick, and his ultimate out-of-nowhere death - a hilariously abrupt death at that), yet, the protagonist stays thoroughly unbeatable until the very end, why the writers of this film would think that this is a good idea is beyond me. This dilemma between its theme and John Wick's Superman-like nature was highlighted even more by Keanu Reeves' very disappointing acting. He was just slow, tired, passive from the first until the last minute, even during action sequences (and of course his facial expressions and voice are still as wooden as ever - I have never ever seen Reeves being a decent actor in any film, even at his height during the "Matrix" years). Yes, yes, I understand that Redditors still get crazy by his "authentic" style of manning a gun, but that style really does not matter in this film as he has to use one hand to hold up the bullet-proof vest over his face most of the times (again, an extremely ugly style of action choreography), and Reeves CLEARLY did not act during the demanding action sequences (long-hair cascadeurs must make a lot of money out of this film replacing him) and was also CLEARLY not able to keep up during the action sequences that he showed his face (and thus could not rely on cascadeurs) to the point of making those sequences awkward and boring to look at. Such a disappointing film this one really is, I expected more, much more.

02. Avatar: The Way of Water (2022): 3.5/5

An extremely well-crafted film that actually reflects a lot of the older and more "traditional" films by James Cameron like "Terminator" or "Titanic" (the whole sinking-ship sequence in this film is just "Titanic in Pandora") and thus gives out a surprising sense of nostalgia, especially given the closeness of the story and motifs of this film to the very traditional epic "Dance with Wolves". Despite its rather conventional and "slim" story (I would rather not call this story "simplistic"), the film is still thoroughly entertaining thanks to a level of CGI so high NO contemporary sci-fi could even attempt to achieve (the CGI of the new "Black Panther" looks like a child play in comparison to this one), an amazing quality of cinematography - again, the top-notch underwater cinematography (James Cameron's passion since forever) in this film is simply incomparable to any other film in the market, very well choreographed action sequences, and satisfying character development for the leading cast (the supporting cast is rather underwhelmed, but given the extensive running time for action sequences, something else has to be sacrificed). Still, the film is a little bit too long for my taste (probably due to James Cameron's need to tell his stories and the world he has spent decades to imagine and create) and the "Avatar-form" of the cast, no matter how excellent the CGI is, still creates an emotional gap for the audience and thus somewhat distants these characters from the audience from the relatability point of view (something like "Why should we care for these strange "blue creatures", even though the story itself is VERY relatable). Still, this film totally deserves its box office of more than 2 billions USD - a much better sci-fi than what Marvel and DC could pump out these days.

03. The Flash (2023): 3/5

(Woo, three full months since my last review, it has probably never been this long that I have not watched a full film since forever). An okay superhero film with a very, very questionable second act (mostly due to the hideously bad performance by Ezra Miller as the "alternate" Flash) that is somewhat redeemed by the last act and the heartwarming presence of Michael Keaton, who is easily the best part of this film. I like the visual and action style of this film, which is way more unique and memorable than any Marvel film - especially the more recent ones, but the poorly-made CGI did take part of the fun and immersion away from the watching experience. The way the film handles the time travel paradox and the heavy subject of parental loss is also commendable but would have been much more effective with a better lead (Ezra Miller is not THAT bad, he simply is not capable of such a multi-dimensional (literally and figuratively) character like The Flash and his alternate in this film (probably very few, the kind of Leonardo DiCaprio or Christian Bale, can, maybe, but not Miller). It is also funny that EVEN in the alternate world, the Soviet/Russians (I am not sure Hollywood and Americans in general can distinguish between the two or try to do so) are STILL the bad guys - the propaganda game is still as strong as ever with Hollywood.

04. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 (2023): 3.5/5

I really like the visual and concept art of this film, especially the biology-inspired tech and vehicles (the space ships in this film look particularly cool) and the various cyberpunk animals that remind me somewhat of "TMNT" in a post-apocalyptic setting. The storyline involving Rocket Racoon is also very emotional, impactful, and effective in making this film different from the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe rosters despite the eugenics theme has already been used for countless time before by previous films in this "Universe". There are numerous things that I do not like about this film, though, which made me rate this film lower than it would have been had those issues been fixed. Those include the half-an-hour-too-long running time of this film due to various "fillers" that contribute nothing to the story or character progress, the again-disappointing main villain who in parts is overpowered and other parts illogically under-powered, wayyy too many banters that are corny and wasteful of running time, extreme inconsistency in terms of character behaviors (for example, Drax is KNOWN for his daredevil nature and yet appears to be a coward for multiple occasions throughout this film), and boring action sequences (except for the "hallway" fight scene - that part is very cool). Not a perfect film in any sense, but at least a film that I enjoy (despite the obnoxious banters) - already a rare feat for a Marvel Cinematic Universe member.

05. Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023): 4/5

Extremely titillating animated film with probably the most sophisticated visual that I have ever seen (Mamoru Hosoda's Summer Wars comes close, but to a lesser extent). The choreography of the key action sequences is also very, very impressive that can easily beat any live action film by Marvel or DC. Still, I did not enjoy this film as much as its prequel, probably due to its super fast pace that is breathtaking figuratively and literally as it made me tired after watching for awhile. Also, despite its sophisticated look, this film does not have the novelty of blending different styles of drawing and CGI like its prequel, thus it could not amaze the audience like me the way the first film did. Still, an excellent film and I do look forward to its sequel.

06. Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One (2023): 3/5

The film is a little bit gimmicky with a script significantly worse than the recent Mission: Impossible films including another disappointing set of villains (even Vanessa Kirby's character, who was so cool in the previous film, is portrayed in a way more comical and forgettable fashion). The action sequences are still good, especially the falling train sequence by the end that reminds me a lot of Uncharted II - what would have been had Sony entrusted Tom Cruise with the adaptation project of Uncharted.... Still, probably due to the undercook script, the action aspect of this film also appears to be disjointed, less impressive, and inconsistently choreographed. I still enjoy the film thoroughly, though, as it is always an honest attempt by Cruise et al. in entertaining people without trying to be pretentious or preachy - a commendable approach that Tom Cruise has followed in this later phase of his career.  

07. A Haunting in Venice (2023): 2.5/5

A pretty subpar Agatha Christie adaptation in comparison to the previous two Hercule Poirot films directed by Branagh. Branagh himself is still quite good, but the uninspiring script and especially the wooden acting by the otherwise-competent cast really dampened the mood and the quality of this film. Tina Fey and Kelly Reilly, the latter of whom I have loved for more than two decades since her "L'Auberge Espagnole" day, are particularly bad in this film with amateurish performances that are clearly not up to their true standard. The most memorable thing about this film might be the lovely shots of Venice that Kenneth Branagh was able to manage, to the point of "de-populating" this crowded island-city from the top destination of global tourists down to a peaceful and somewhat desolated post-war Italian city and thus giving me a profound sense of nostalgia similar to the Merchant-Ivory films of the old days, especially when being coupled with the classic and angelic voice of Vera Lynn through her "When the Lights Go On Again". 

08. The Killer (2023): 4/5

Is this the best Fincher's film? Probably not. But am I satisfied with this one? Totally. This film is just a pure Fincher flic through and through. From an absolutely stunning and terrifying soundtrack and sound design to the perfect attention to details that only Fincher can achieve, everything about this film helps Fincher's portray of a descent to ... normality of a seemingly superhuman contract killer, played perfectly by Michael Fassbender. Some might find this film devoid of emotions and thus too cool/cold for its own good, but I fully enjoyed this carefully-designed mood of this film, which is very much in line with Fincher's previous thrillers "Gone Girl" and "Mindhunter". I love, love the way Fincher "degraded" his protagonist throughout the film from a meticulous killer "leaving no trace" to an ordinary revengeful guy that leaves fingerprints and CCTV evidences everywhere on his way to the ultimate act of revenge. Of course, the plot and the dialogue of this film could not be compared to Fincher's absolute best - "Seven" in my opinion, but an entertaining one? You cannot find a better one.

09. Full River Red (2023): 3/5

Just like its outrageously mismatched soundtrack, this film feels great, and not-that-great at the same time. For example, I was very moved by the little humanist moments shared between Zhang Da and his brother-in-law Sun Jun or especially the tiny bits of romance between Zhang Da and Zither, but somehow those heartwarming/wrenching moments are just all over the place and just could not create a true emotional impact on the audience. The whodunit theme of this film was also masterfully done by Zhang Yimou (as he often does) but the overtly patriotic tone by the end really undermines such whodunit approach of this film. Still, I enjoy this historical piece thoroughly and can only hope that Zhang can spare some part of his busy schedule making contemporary "patriotic" films for these historical and wuxia projects that I enjoy much, much more. 

10. Kingdom III: Flame of Destiny (2023): 4/5

ANOTHER amazing installation of this "Kingdom" series (I gave the previous two 4/5 as well). I cannot believe that the filmmakers were able to maintain the quality of this series, but they did it again, I am so happy! Of course this film possesses a big advantage having a superb original manga script to adapt, but the pacing, the acting, the production values, and the concept arts, all those excellent aspects of this film are totally due to the quality and dedication of the filmmakers and the cast, kudos to them. I cannot wait for the next installation of this series, especially the sure return of Masami Nagasawa's Yang Duan He, who in my opinion is still the coolest character in this series full of cool characters. Her necessary absence in this third film, although not affecting its quality, did make me miss her character and long for her return. Such an enjoyment this film really is.

11. Lesson in Murder (2022): 3/5

Pretty decent Japanese-style murder mystery/criminal mind film. The film itself is quite slow with a final "plot twist"/revelation relatively easy to predict but possesses a very immersive ambience thanks to the nice cinematography (the repeated superimposition of the main protagonist and antagonist during their meetings is interesting and implies a lot, but turns to a little bit jarring by the end due to the lack of variation of this superimposing frame), unique palette of colours that is often used in Japanese ... serious drama/family films à-la-Hirokazu Koreeda, and some surprise sequences of goriness. On the other end, except for the main antagonist/villain, the film has a less-than-optimal cast with unconvincing performance of the leads, thus unfortunately makes this film subpart to similar ones that are adapted from Keigo Higashino's novels and often have superior casts. Still, a very easy film to follow and a nice watch for any fan of the Japanese murder mystery genre (like me).

12. Creation of the Gods I: Kingdom of Storms (2023): 3/5

This film really has amazing CGI scenes that are totally comparable to Hollywood standard. However, like many recent Chinese films, CGI is definitely over-used here despite the fact that the film has little fighting sequences, and thus gives the audience a jarring vibe, especially in the second half. The script of the film is solid enough, as it was adapted from the freaking Fengshen Bang (which I love and is the only reason why I watched this film), with fleshed out characters and easy-to-follow lores and story settings. Aside from the exhilarating opening battle, though, the slow pacing of the film makes this script less effective since the filmmakers spent so much time in building their characters (who are all already very well-established characters in Chinese tradition and literature that probably any Chinese or ones with interest in Chinese culture like me already know to some level) instead of accelerating the films to the way more exciting battles and confrontations. The poor performance across the board did not help on this aspect either. This film just reminds me of Zhang Yimou's Curse of the Golden Flower due to the similar approach of "style over substance" with a lot of exotic settings, golden costumes, and unique Chinese imperial dynamics between characters. But Creation of the Gods fell way behind in terms of acting (its young cast might look handsome and powerful, but their acting is anything but) and production design (which is very inconsistent - great at parts but terribly cheap at others) and therefore becomes much less memorable. At least this film sets a very solid background for the sequels, which would, and must, have many more exciting moments of battles and duels. As a side note, originally I had given this film a 2.5 stars, but the more I thought about it, the more I realized that it did indeed succeed in GIVING the audience a promising launching ground for its sequels, and the (supernatural) character designs are also very impressive disregarding the acting quality of their performers, so a 3 might be a more appropriate score. Nonetheless, I really look forward to the sequels, hopefully they will live up to my own expectation after watching this film.

13. A Man (2022): 4/5

Seemingly a heavy everyday drama at first, this film quickly turns into a strange mystery and yet again into an existential tale of those who try to find themselves while facing prejudices and tragedies in life, and yet again into a story of ironies and twists of fate. Such a strange combination and somehow the film still works thanks to an extremely impressive cast who all performed very well no matter how important their roles are in this film, and also due to the subdued, seemingly ordinary and even illogical at parts yet very effective approach to storytelling by the filmmakers. Thus this film reminds me of "Drive My Car", which coincidentally won the Japan Academy Film Prize for Best Film just the year before this film, and also succeeded in "de-dramatizing" very heavy dramas in a very relatable way to the audience. Of course, one might find this film's telling of major issues in modern Japanese society like prejudice (against children of parents with not-so-great past, or against Zainichi aka. Korean Japanese), unhappy families/parenthood/childhood, or loneliness and loss of oneself, especially in this era of smartphone and social network too "unrealistic" and "stage". But those issues are very true and have already been explored in other Japanese literary or cinematic works and thus this film appears to me to be totally convincing, especially with such excellent acting across the board - no wonder why this film basically swept all acting categories at the 46th Japan Academy Film Prize save for the Best Actress category since this film does not necessarily have one. Simple yet deeply effective and emotional films like this really is the bread and butter of Japanese cinema.

14. Laplace's Witch (2015): 2/5

A shockingly bad adaptation of a Keigo Higashino novel, and it was even more shocking to me when I realized that its director is no one else but the unique Takashi Miike. This film's script and implementation are just all over the place without a clear focus on either character development or "problem solving". Instead Miike spent too much time on nonsensical monologues of both protagonists and antagonists that contribute almost nothing to the story but only make it more incoherent and unimpressive, especially given the very consistent quality of Keigo Higashino's writing. At least the acting is quite good, especially by Suzu Hirose who played the titular Laplace's Witch, but the rest of the cast lack the necessary charisma to the point that I had hard time believe that Sho Sakurai (who played the actual main character of the film - Professor Aoe) is a member of the famed Arashi band.

15. Sleeping Forest (2014): 3.5/5

I did not realize that this film is just a television film instead of a full-scale cinema release. Therefore, even though I really hate its digitally-filmed appearance, I cannot deduce a point from my score for this film due to that television-quality look. As a television film, the acting quality in this film is not that great either, especially during the New York sequence when Hiroshi Abe's English is so poor that it becomes hilarious given a very specific dialogue before this sequence assuring that Detective Kaga, as "an elite", can speak English very well. Still, I like Abe since he simply is the perfect embodiment of Detective Kaga in terms of both appearance and manner, which are very important aspects to an avid fan of Detective Kaga like me (in my opinion Kaga is still the best character created by Keigo Higashino, smart, likeable, and very relatable to the audience). The female cast is also very decent, and above all the story and twist-and-turns are really good, realistic, emotional/sentimental (a typical trait and strong aspect in Higashino's writing), and satisfying. Might not be among the best Keigo Higashino adaptations, but an enjoyable one this one still is. 

16. Eat Drink Man Woman (1994): 4.5/5

I do not know why I could not find my review of this film, despite really did see it long time ago, probably almost two decades I think. Still, a second watch with the eyes of a married man with two children is still as fresh as ever, especially with such a refreshing film like this one. Thanks to my wife, who have been craving for "culinary films" after watching "Boudin" that I recommended this film for her and consequently watched it (again) with her. I vaguely remembered that the first time I watched this amazing piece by Ang Lee, it was a delightful experience full of laughs and optimism. This time I still have a lot of fun watching the mouth-watering food being made and the "messy" relationships of the film's characters. But beyond that, I realize much more about the intricate development of those characters, from trying to "fit it" to the "acceptable" recipe of a "normal" life to living at their fullest, cooking the food they want to make, the way they want to eat. Now, being older and with actual experience of forming and building a family of my own, I appreciate even more Ang Lee's masterful stroke in making his characters as normal, as approachable as possible. I can easily find a piece of myself in one character, another piece in others, and still at the same time be able to enjoy the film as it is - a cinematic experience full of "catchy" foods, lovingly characters (I admired Wu Chien-lien for her Anita Mui-like beauty the first time I watched this film, but this time, I adored her even more for her tasteful "office wears", too bad her career was not as long as I expected after such a rapid rise with this film and of course "A Moment of Romance"). 

17. Tampopo (1985): 2.5/5

This film is way worse than I expected, especially given its high rating and praises from even top critics like Roger Ebert. The foods in this film (the first reason why I watched it with my wife, who had asked me for more "food films" after watching "Eat Drink Man Woman") is good, but other aspects are really not of my liking, from the typical (and terrible) Japanese style of overacting, to the confusing editing that makes this film more like a mosaic of lives and loves for good food instead of a food film with a coherent and focused plot. 

18. A Guilty Conscience (2023): 2.5/5

This film won the Hong Kong Film Award for Best Film WITHOUT a single win in any other category, I should have taken that fact as a warning sign about this film. This film really is a big letdown to me as it not only does not live up to its "HKFA winner" hype and to its very interesting pretext (a legal fight between a destitute lawyer and some "old money" evils, and a mystery of whodunit surrounded by layered tragedies involving children, disability, unfaithfulness, and the eternal social class division), but also has very poor acting, writing, and cinematography qualities. Of course it is still watchable, and pretty entertaining at that - especially with the "drinking water while bleeding" twist at the end, but nonetheless feels very, very emotionally manipulative from the beginning (when the said destitute lawyer was a utterly despicable legal guy with nothing but money in his eyes) through the transition (when he suddenly turned righteous overnight - literally and figuratively) and until the end (when he finally and predictably transformed into a hero of the poor and a sly and respectful figure in court) without any smooth and convincing character development, whereas the rest of the cast - his supporting cast remained exactly the same as they were from throughout the two-hour film. Talking about the cast, my heart broke a little bit watching the poor performance of the entire cast, from the lead actor to every single supporting ones - the kind of performance that is very suitable for the traditional Hong Kong legal series that I once loved very much, but not subtle enough for a competent cinema release, especially given the long pedigree of superior performers in Hong Kong like Tony Leung Chiu-wai, the "Four Heavenly Kings", or the many leading ladies that Hong Kong cinema once had. Nothing represents this lack of acting quality in this film better than the annoying appearance of Michael Wong with his annoying "style" of switching back and forth between Cantonese and English for obviously no reason - I hated it then and I hate it even more now. My heart broke since I felt again, why watching this film, that maybe Hong Kong cinema will never be able to recover, to return to its height when even this poorly-made film could win an award that was once only reserved to the very best like "Chungking Express" or "Comrades: Almost a Love Story". Such a letdown, such a letdown.









mardi 21 mars 2023

The Sparring Partner (2022)

 


An excellent film that contains all the trademarks of Hong Kong cinema at its height (in the past). Quality speaking, I would give this one a four due to the excessive violence at parts, the too-ambitious intention of the filmmakers to cover too much ground (and too many genres) within just one film (which made the film a little bit longer than necessary), or the subpart production value at parts. But since such excellence in filmmaking is really a rarity in Hong Kong cinema nowadays, and also due to the fact that this film pays a lot of very good homage to Hong Kong cinema and television of the past, I am more than happy to give its another half a star. Watching this film really made me longing to the courtroom TV series that once dominated TVB and ATV, or the hilariously graphical horror/lewd Cat-III Hong Kong films featuring well-known actors like Anthony Wong (The Untold Story, Ebola Syndrome, Erotic Nightmare) or Simon Yam (Dr. Lamb) that actually borrowed a lot from ACTUAL notorious crimes/affairs in Hong Kong - a small land that somehow possesses so many psychopaths or criminals with psychopathic acts even until this very day (the very recent murder of the model Abby Choi, whose body was chopped up by her in-laws is shockingly not much different from the crime retold by this film, which itself took "inspiration" from true events decades ago). Even the blending of themes and rapid switch of settings and roles is also a cerebral trademark of Hong Kong cinema (one can only look at Tsui Hark's most recent section in Septet: The Story of Hong Kong to understand such long-lasting influence of this style of filmmaking in Hong Kong). Therefore, I am absolutely not surprised when it was announced that this film totally dominated the nomination list of this year's Hong Kong Film Award (why Septet has no love in this latest edition of the HKFA, though, I have no idea!). I have no doubt that this film will win most, if not all of these HKFA categories that it was nominated. Really, this film not only has a wonderfully written script full of nuances, emotions, revelations, and twist-and-turns (and also an intriguing ending fully open for different interpretations), but such script was delivered extremely well by the very able cast (that does not have a lot of "star power" like many other Hong Kong films these days with better-known cast) that was able to tell the story of each character, and to share with the audience the uncertain feeling of any juror when facing with the decision of what is "right", what is "wrong", what is "just", what is "unjust" without truly knowing the stories and "characters" behind such horrendous crimes like the parricide depicted in this film (coincidentally enough, Louisa So, who played probably the only true "hero" of the film - the lawyer for the "stupid" defendant, was also a major cast in Detective Investigation Files - THE best whodunit/detective series that TVB has ever produced). In fact, this layered film is much more than "just" a good courtroom film (despite its seemingly "superficial" and greasy look), as it is also a "whodunit", a philosophical discourse on the good and the evil (ALL characters, leading or supporting, in this film are very well-crafted and have a lot of nuance to the point that even by the end of the film, one can hardly tell who is good, who is bad, who is villain, who is hero), and even a commentary about the disarray of the Hong Kong society post-1997. Technically speaking, this is also an excellent product thanks to a very distinctive aesthetics, impactful sound design, and many interesting shots that truly highlight the complexity of its sophisticated stories and characters (among them, I particularly like the "confession-style" shot of the exchange between the prosecuting lawyers and the main villain's cousin). A very memorable film, and might be a tiny glimpse of hope for a revival, if any, of Hong Kong cinema, I truly wish. 

samedi 11 février 2023

The Glance of Music (2021)

 



An extremely moving documentary about Ennio Morricone that came out very unfortunately a little bit after Morricone's own passing in 2020, probably due to the notorious long gestion time needed by Giuseppe Tornatore. This is an amazingly emotional film about Morricone's quest to create a new path for music in films, and more importantly his struggle to win approval from his very own teacher and colleagues in classical music, who only until A Fistful of Dollars and especially Once Upon a Time in America could finally admit that Morricone's works for these films are also music at its best, at its purest, and not just another "prostituting work" by a classical maestro for the film industry for "a fistful of dollars". Due to the very moving nature of Morricone's works, this film could easily bring the audience to tears, especially during the special sequences when Morricone and his colleagues retold his writing for the pinnacles of his film music career including the aforementioned A Fistful of Dollars, The Mission, and especially Once Upon a Time in America, or Joan Baez's Here's to You. Too bad that even though this film was directed by Tornatore, he saved very little time for his very own masterpiece Cinema Paradiso, the soundtrack of it - written by Morricone of course is probably among my most favourite (alongside with the music of Once Upon a Time in America). An amazing, amazing film nonetheless, which will stay with me for a long time I am very sure.

vendredi 16 décembre 2022

Kfc (2016)


Kfc is the debut feature of Lê Bình Giang - a young filmmaker who had to overcome many challenges, some due to the unique characteristics of this very film, in his way to bring this initially a graduate project to the audience. Called after the famous fried chicken brand that were among the first American fast-food companies, if not the first, able to break into the Vietnamese market after the normalization of bilateral relationships between the once bitter enemies Vietnam and the United States, this film does contain numerous images and plot points related to KFC - the food. But if someone expects a nice and cosy culinary cinema experience, they are in for a treat, a nightmarish treat that is. As this ultraviolet film is anything but nice and cosy. Instead, Bình Giang's debut is a revenge tale full of stomach - turning visuals and characters who made this purely - fiction environment a very hard world to live in and to believe in. Somehow the upfront and central role of violence, extreme and savagery violence, in this film reminds me of the 1992 mockumentary Man Bites Dog and also one of the most extreme action films of Hong Kong cinema since the turn of the new century Dog Bite Dog (2006). But more than just a replica of the past films or a collage of homages and borrow items of the action and crime genres, Kfc surprises the audience with a very clever non linear plot that requires them to give their utmost attention to each "misplaced" sequence of the film if they really want to figure out what really is going on in this hellish world, with these devilish characters. Of course, such concentration is not at all an easy feat since every single sequence of this film contains many unconventional and upsetting details, but if anyone with determination to stay through the one - hour length of the film and able to stitch together a somewhat comprehensible storyline for Kfc, they would surely appreciate the very distinctive characters and world-building carefully crafted by Lê Bình Giang, his crew, and the passionate cast. Judging by the creative script alone, Kfc could already be considered a commendable debut by a promising director. But when adding the consideration about the rather-conservative and traditional taste of the Vietnamese public and the fact that overtly violent domestic films would hardly be able to find their way to the big screens here, one should give Lê Bình Giang a big applause for his creativity and audacity. Of course, the violence in this film would understandably turn some viewers away, or be considered by others violent just for the sake of it like many slashers b-films churning out every year "straight to DVD". But for more open-minded viewers or ones already accustomed to stylistic slasher films and the nightmarish manga of Junji Ito and thus could stomach the incessant flow of imaginary violence and cannibalism in this film, Kfc could actual be a breath of fresh air of the indie genre that reflects the director's very unique view of violence itself, of lives and deaths, of the hardships one might encounter at the bottom of the modern society, and of the hard-to-imagine but actually very probable cruelty a human can inflict upon another for the sake of survival or revenge. Even without such a second layer of thought, the very creative nonlinear narrative of this film, which could make fans of Christopher Nolan think of his excellent second feature Memento (2000), is more than enough to make Kfc a memorable watching experience and a very impressive "Hello World" for Lê Bình Giang to filmgoers who expect new, and unique things coming to the cinema.

====

This commissioned piece has been published somewhere.